Blog Feed

‘Terrible’ new weir proposed for river as flows resume

Sydney Morning Herald

By Peter Hannam

A stoush is brewing on the state’s inland rivers over the proposal for a new weir that could reduce flows to the “degraded” Macquarie Marshes just as the wetlands start to recover from drought.

WaterNSW has begun consulting on a so-called re-regulating storage for the Macquarie River between Narromine and Warren in north-western NSW. The weir could store at least six billion litres and create a pool 30-60 kilometres long, potentially inundating river red gums and other ecosystems.

Ecologists, recreational fishers and some farmers worry that adding another dam to river flow would impede the recovery of endangered fish species already hard hit by the long dry spell over most of the region. Similar public works, proposed at the height of the drought, will move closer to construction in the months to come.

“It is another barrier in a system with many barriers to native fish and sediment and nutrient transport,” Richard Kingsford, director of the University of NSW’s Centre for Ecosystem Science, said.

“The Macquarie has one of the poorest populations of native fish in the Murray-Darling Basin, including the loss of some species.”

The dam would mean more reliable water for some irrigators but at the expense of water to the Macquarie Marshes, “one of the three most degraded Ramsar sites in the Murray-Darling Basin”.

A Ramsar site is a wetland site designated to be of international importance under a UNESCO treaty from the 1970s.

Matt Hansen, president of Inland Waterways, said another fish barrier would be “terrible for the river”, adding that “we have had catastrophic fish kills in so many different rivers” during the drought.

The weir on that part of the river, at Gin Gin, was already “one of the worst barriers to fish and an absolute crime”, Mr Hansen said.

WaterNSW said the project would involve the “consideration” of the future of the Gin Gin weir, including an investigation of whether it should partially or fully decommissioned.

A spokesman for WaterNSW said any new “gated weir and fishway structure” on the river would need the development of a detailed business case, which is due for completion by August, and then an environmental impact study by the year’s end.

“The re-regulating structure will enhance the overall efficiency of river operations by reducing transmission losses,” the agency said.

Garry Hall, a grazier whose property includes part of the Macquarie Marshes, said “a few small flows” had made it to the wetlands.

Mr Hall said he was keen to take part in another round of stakeholder meetings planned for later this month. He was concerned, though, with the weir’s structure and “opportunities for protocols that could undermine” whatever pledges the government made to secure its approval.

Professor Kingsford said the planned weir would struggle to meet approval under the federal government Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act.

“I would be surprised if it would get the approval given the state of the Macquarie Marshes,” he said, adding the longer term effect would be felt the next time conditions dried up again.

“These projects will certainly make the droughts worse for our environmental assets such as the Macquarie Marshes and also downstream graziers.”

 

‘Terrible’ new weir proposed for river as flows resume

Outstanding issues within NSW’s Final Draft Water Resource Plans and consequences for the Murray-Darling Basin Plan – June 2020. Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists

Water Resource Plans (WRPs) outline how the management of water resources in a particular river catchment will be consistent with the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. They set out the rules and arrangements relating to water take, environmental water (‘planned’ and ‘held’), managing water during extreme events and strategies to achieve water quality standards and manage risks. They also specify environmental objectives and watering requirements. WRPs include groundwater systems and surface water areas (rivers and creeks).
Catchment-specific water plans that are established under state legislation also need to be updated for consistency with the WRPs and requirements of the Basin Plan (i.e. Water Sharing Plans (WSPs) under the NSW Water Management Act 2000).

If the WRPs and WSPs are accredited in their current form, there is potential for significant consequences for river health and Ramsar-listed wetlands of international importance including the Gwydir wetlands and Macquarie Marshes, undermining the Basin Plan.

Read more: NSW-WRP-issues-and-safeguards

Debit water accounts, rather than destroy the river.

Since 2014, WaterNSW have had a protocol in the Macquarie-Cudgegong Valley where if a water ordering customer has a history of cancelling water orders after they’ve been released from the dam, their water account can be debited by the volume of water they order, not the volume they pump.

To date, this protocol hasn’t been applied, rather water customers who habitually order more water than they need are only debited the volume of water they pump.

The capture of rainfall rejection orders is the main reason being put forward for the construction of the enormous in channel dam at Gin Gin.

Why should the public be asked to foot the large bill of over $30 million for a massive gated structure that will dam the river for 30 km, destroying Red Gums and making the river uninhabitable for native fish? 

This dam would withhold water from the internationally recognised Ramsar listed Macquarie Marshes, put the town of Warren at higher risk of running out of water, deny natural tributary inflows to the creeks and the Lower Macquarie and make connection between the Macquarie and Barwon Rivers even harder to achieve.

If water customers have a habit of ordering more water than they extract, then why doesn’t WaterNSW use the protocol and debit their accounts?

Water Order Debiting Macquarie Cudgegong

Dr Martin Mallen-Cooper comments on the new Macquarie dam at Gin Gin

The proposed Macquarie Re-regulating Structure would have a major negative impact on the river ecosystem, reducing biodiversity and reducing native fish populations.  There are four major impacts:

  1. Capture of tributary flows

All environmental water is not equal.  River flows that are uninterrupted by dams and weirs have extremely high ecological value, compared to flows that are stored in dams and weirs and re-released.

Uninterrupted river flows pick up nutrients (especially carbon such as dead eucalyptus leaves) and generate natural productivity of plankton, which is the essential food source of fish larvae.  This is the fundamental process of river ecosystems that sustains native fish populations.

If flow is uninterrupted over long distances, it has even greater ecological value as this enables fish that are a long distance downstream to detect the increasing flow (fish can sense the slightest increase in water velocity and have an extremely acute sense of smell) and migrate upstream to spawn so their larvae have greater survival.

The advantages of uninterrupted river flow are that: it occurs with a natural season; it has a natural rise and fall in river level; and it has natural, flowing water, hydraulics.  It also has no thermal pollution.  All these aspects contribute to these flows having high ecological value.

In the Macquarie Valley, tributary flows and rainfall events downstream of Burrendong Dam are one of the most valuable ecological assets that are presently sustaining native fish populations.  If the proposed regulator captures and re-regulates these tributary flows and main-stem flows that result from rainfall downstream of Burrendong Dam, native fish populations will have less successful breeding and populations will certainly decline.

The mitigation for this impact is to provide full transparency of tributary flows and rainfall downstream of Burrendong Dam.

 

  1. Impacts of variable water levels on river-edge and channel habitats

Tributary rivers of the northern Murray-Darling Basin have highly variable river levels, from floods to droughts.  However, these water levels vary over a very consistent regime over time – rising in floods but spending a lot of time at a low level with varying baseflows.  The time-scale and season of this variation is very important for fish.  Nesting species such as catfish and Murray cod establish a nest in spring and if the water level drops too much and/or too quickly they abandon the nest and there is no spawning that season[1].  This is an insidious impact as it does not become apparent until many years later as old fish die out and are not replaced by young fish.

Gin Gin Weir presently has a stable water level, while the new regulator will have highly varying water levels that will vary over short times scales within an irrigation season.  These are likely to impact breeding of Murray cod and catfish.

Under natural conditions in non-flood times, there are relatively stable water levels with occasional pulses of flow.  These conditions enable aquatic plants to develop in rivers, which contributes to the basis for the food chain, and ultimately fish survival and ongoing populations.  Regulators with highly varying water levels have weirpools that are characterised by barren banks and river channels, devoid of aquatic plants.  This breakdown of the aquatic food chain results in less food for native fish, reducing their health, resilience, and survival.

 

  1. Impacts on flowing-water habitats

Rivers have a natural mix of flowing and stillwater habitats.  Standing beside a healthy river, we all visually recognise flowing water and we recognise eddies, backwaters, pools and riffles – that is, healthy rivers have diverse river hydraulics (or hydrodynamics).

This hydraulic diversity provides habitat diversity and biodiversity.  There are aquatic animals and plants that specifically thrive in hydraulic diversity including: natural biofilms (fungi, algae, protozoa, bacteria), diatoms, plankton, aquatic insects, snails, mussels and fish.  The high biodiversity supported by hydraulic diversity supports a diverse food web, which contributes to resilience of the river ecosystem to withstand events such as droughts.

Weirs create backwater and pool-like conditions; where this happens and hydraulic diversity is reduced, biodiversity declines.  That is, some species become locally extinct – they cannot survive in the semi-permanent pool-like conditions.  Under natural conditions, prior to any dams or weirs, the Macquarie River could stop flowing and become a series of pools but only very rarely and for short periods of time.  Notably in 1902, in possibly the worst drought on record – the Federation Drought – when the Darling stopped flowing for 11 months at Menindee, the Macquarie River remained flowing the entire time.[2]

So flowing water habitats are a foundation of the Macquarie River ecosystem.

Two key species that thrive in flowing water are Murray cod and River mussel.  Murray cod are a valuable recreational fish and both species have high cultural and totemic value in aboriginal culture.  Many river mussels died in the last drought in the Darling River because there were no flowing water habitats for many, many months. Although adult Murray cod can survive in large pools, where there is good water quality, the survival of larvae and young fish is dependent on flowing water habitats and the diverse food webs that these provide.  Hence, to maintain the Murray cod population, flowing water and hydraulic diversity are essential to provide key nursery habitats.

The pool-like conditions that are created by weirs, not only reduce hydraulic diversity and biodiversity, but are also more favourable habitats for pest species like carp.

The proposed regulator will have three major impacts on flowing water:

  1. upstream of the regulator the backwater will be much greater than the present Gin Gin Weir, creating more still-water conditions and inundating Murray cod nursery habitats and River mussel habitat;
  2. as the level of the weirpool decreases upstream during the irrigation season, and more of the river channel is exposed, it will not have enough time to enable recolonisation of animals that specialise in this flowing-water habitat (e.g. aquatic insects, snails, mussels) – hence, critical food webs will not be established;
  • the regulator will capture tributary flows and local rainfall events – therefore passing less flow downstream which will directly reduce the extent and duration of flowing water conditions.

 

Dr. Martin Mallen-Cooper

 

 

[1] Stuart I., Sharpe C., Stanislawski K., Parker A. and Mallen-Cooper M. (2019) From an irrigation system to an ecological asset: adding environmental flows establishes recovery of a threatened fish species. Marine and Freshwater Research 70, 1295-1306.

[2] Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission (1956) ‘Surface Water Supply of New South Wales. Stream Flow Records Period to 31st December 1950. Volume 1.  Darling River Basin ‘ (V.C.N Blight, Government Printer: Sydney)

Your Say was heard! – Marshes and water birds to be considered in Macquarie dam EIS

** Impacts to the Ramsar listed Macquarie Marshes and migratory birds to be recognised as significant in Environmental Impact Statement! **

Public comment was recently invited on the EPBC Act referral for the Macquarie River re-regulating weir – which is a proposal to build another dam on the Macquarie River upstream from the Ramsar listed Macquarie Marshes.

This document will inform the Environmental Impact Statement for the project. WaterNSW prepared the referral, for the consideration of the federal environment department. In their proposal, WaterNSW considered that the impact of the new dam on the Macquarie Marshes and on migratory birds would not be significant.

Many of you prepared submissions, and disagreed with WaterNSW, instead identifying many ways that the dam would in fact have very significant impacts on the wetlands and the migratory birds that rely on them.

** YOU WERE HEARD! **

The environmental impact statement will now look closely at the significant impact the dam would have on the Macquarie Marshes and migratory birds.

Approved Referral

An alternative to the dam proposal was presented in the referral, that the current Gin Gin weir be replaced where it is – without the capability of creating a new dam. Any new structure would also have to incorporate a fishway. This would be a great outcome for the Wambuul Macquarie River!

 

The referral 2020-8652 – referral_Final produced by WaterNSW identified a lot of significant impacts that the dam is expected to have. Here’s a quick summary:

  • Reduced inflows into the Macquarie Marshes – small flows in dry years are critical to the Marshes.
  • 30km of river banks vegetation would be drowned.
  • Loss of habitat types such as riffle zones due to flooding and decreased water quality.
  • Loss of aquatic and river bank habitat for 30km.
  • Loss of snag habitat and spawning sites for vulnerable Murray Cod.
  • Native fish eggs would sink in the still water and die on the bottom of the river.
  • Fish in the area would have limited movement, even with the fishway, which is not enough to counteract the loss of habitat.
  • Loss of flowing river habitat.
  • The river banks will degrade and erode, land most likely will have to be lined with rocks for 30km – creating a sterile lifeless in channel dam.
  • Impacts to the groundwater recharge and groundwater dependent ecosystems.
  • Threats to native fish listed under the Fisheries Management Act – Eel-tailed catfish, Olive Perchlet Southern Spotted Purple Gudgeon, Silver Perch, Trout Cod as well as Murray Cod.
  • A registered Aboriginal heritage site will be inundated by the resulting weir pool.

 

It’s a dribble.

The Chair of Macquarie Food and Fibre, Tony Quigley spoke on ABC Central West Radio on Monday 11th May about the planned re-regulating weir at Gin Gin.

Tony explains (in his own words) that the giant structure will mean a loss to the environment and communities downstream of Gin Gin of the significant volume of 25 billion litres a year.

“It’s a dribble” says Tony.

According to Tony, any water that flows from the regulated Macquarie into the unregulated river, and on to the Creeks, Ramsar listed Macquarie Marshes, the Lower Macquarie and into the Barwon Darling Rivers is “lost out of the bottom”. Tony says irrigators want the new dam, so the water can be “saved in the system”, in other words used for irrigation.

This figure of 25 billion litres a year is new information to members of Healthy Rivers Dubbo and other community stakeholders, who have engaged with WaterNSW on this project from November 2019.

WaterNSW have been working very hard to assure the community that no tributary flows from the Little, Bell or Talbragar Rivers will be captured by this new dam. They claim that only water orders released from Burrendong dam and then cancelled will be captured. That would mean no more than 6 billion litres a year.

But their own documentation states that they will use some tributary inflows to meet orders. (Page 16 Scoping Report)

Some tributary inflows that enter the Macquarie below Burrendong are considered dam releases by WaterNSW. We don’t know how much, it would be different every year – the information is not public.

The illogical truth that some tributary inflows that do not come from the dam are classed as dam releases, might go some way to explain where Tony understands the 25 billion litres that the irrigators expect the weir to deliver for them will come from.

Tributary inflows.

 

Macquarie water is sold before it falls as rain.

Burrendong empties at blistering speed.

The dam is massive – 1,188 billion litres. For context, Dubbo draws 8 billion litres a year to meet 70% of town water needs.

Burrendong has nearly bottomed out three times. In the summer of 2019/20 plans were in place to suck the dead water from the very bottom of the dam before letting the river below Burrendong dry up.

The river below Warren was allowed to dry up, followed by massive deaths of native fish, turtle, mussels, and other wildlife. People below Warren were left with no access to water from the river for their domestic and stock needs. It was a tough time.

Burrendong empties so quickly because the rules in the water sharing plan allow it to.

Water that has not yet fallen as rain over the Macquarie catchment is sold in advance.

The credit rule is essentially allocating clouds – water that hasn’t even fallen in the catchment yet,” said Celine Steinfeld, lead author of the paper published in the Journal of Hydrology, and also a member of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists. “It was clear that water in the Macquarie had been overallocated.” (SMH Clouds become water entitlements in ad hoc river plan, paper finds)

The NSW Government knows the Macquarie is over allocated. On page 89 of their 2014 State Infrustructure Strategy they explain that while Burrendong is one of the biggest dams in state, the irrigation industry has developed to a size where the natural capacity of the river has been exceeded. There is simply too much water being sucked out.

When working out how much water to sell every year, the NSW Government does not take into account any rainfall and inflow data from before 2004. They choose to only look at last centuries rainfall patterns when is was a lot wetter.

The super weir to make everything even worse

The NSW Government are planning to add to our problems by building a re-regulating weir at Gin Gin that will allow even more water to be extracted.

The purpose of the enormous gated weir is to get more control over water in the river and make more water available for general security users. The effect is to convert unregulated flow to regulated flow.

This weir will be a loss to the environment of about 25 billion litres a year, according to Tony Quigley, Chair of Macquarie Food and Fibre.

The most effective, common sense way to address water security issues in the Macquarie Valley is to look at the glaring problems with the rules in the water sharing plan, not to pour many tens of millions of public dollars into a monstrous structure that will only benefit a privileged few.

The Real Cost of Floodplain Harvesting

Mel Gray – 31/5/2020

From 2002 to 2008 my parents managed sheep stations along the Darling-Baaka River around the Tilpa area. During visits home when there was a flood event expected, I remember the fax machine would ring every morning with a warning – a rise in the river of xyz metres is expected in your area in xyz weeks’ time. Get prepared!

Growing up on our farm in the flood-zone of the Clarence River, the warning time for floods was days at best, and the impact to our lives and my parents business was all consuming. Like a well-oiled machine, we’d have the cattle and machinery to higher ground, the furniture lifted. Time to settle in and marvel at the awesome power of a Clarence River flood.

The gift that was left of thick rich fertile silt, up to several feet deep, would enrich and sustain the floodplain landscape, and my parent’s business, for years. The salt water that inevitably creeps up the Clarence for several hundred river kilometres in dry times, pushed well back out to sea. The nutrient rich floodwaters kick starting the web of life in the prawn and crab rich estuaries like the Broadwater and Wooloweyah Lagoon and the coastal recreational and commercial fishing grounds off the coast of Yamba. Sea food heaven.

Now out west, we looked forward to experiencing the mighty Darling Baaka in flood. So we’d wait. And wait, and wait. The river levels remained unchanged, after several weeks the faxes would stop.

mum Mum in the Darling Baaka at Tilpa, circa 2004

The floodplains remained dry, dusty, and without the rich covering of fertile silt. The rains that triggered the teasing faxes had fallen many hundreds of kilometres away. We’d heard stories of water skiing on the many enormous ephemeral lakes in the area. They remained empty. By now, almost two decades on, even the centuries old Red Gums are dying.

Since the 1990’s, floods along the Darling Baaka have become smaller and less frequent.  As a consequence the land, animals, people and economies have been dying.

The impact on First Nation communities is heart shattering. The average life expectancy for a male in Wilcannia is 37. The Baaka is the blood of the Barkandji People and without the river they are dying.

wilcannia  ABC News April 2018, Wilcannia

The communities are weakened to a point that we (the white benefactors of colonisation) cannot fully understand. ‘We’ have no way to fully understand how it must be for Elders to watch their 80,000 years plus culture die.

What is happening on the Darling Baaka is cultural genocide.

I moved to the Macquarie Valley in 2011, and fell head over heels in love with the Wambuul Macquarie River and the amazing internationally significant Ramsar listed Macquarie Marshes.

I volunteered a lot of my time restoring the riparian zone around Dubbo with our local BushCare group.

troy Community tree planting day July 2017

I joined a kayak club and got to know the river and Marshes well. I started a grassroots community group, and became an environmental advocate.

The summer of 2019/20 was shocking in the Macquarie Valley. The sharp severity of the drought was unprecedented. The frequency and intensity of the dust storms was actually a little scary.

The Warren weir was raised by WaterNSW stopping flows beyond. Downstream, the river rapidly dried up to a series of disconnected green pools.

ds warren nov 19 Macquarie River, 20km downstream of Warren NSW, November 2019

Insurance populations of turtles and fish were rescued from the river and secured in hatcheries by environmental agencies. Despite commendable efforts from the recreational fishing community to rescue as many fish as possible, mass fish deaths resulted.

The Macquarie Marshes were parched. There hadn’t been any surface water in the core Marsh since January 2019. The impact of years of ‘tight’ river management was evident – there was far less water around, and it disappeared very quickly.

20190828_100555 resize Dead Red Gums, Macquarie Marshes August 2019

Critical human need and stock and domestic requirements had not been met along the creeks downstream of Warren or the Lower Macquarie.

There was a shocking loss of wildlife as a result. Mobs of kangaroos perished, many 50 year old plus turtles died, and we lost some of the oldest mussels known to exist in our fresh water rivers. The loss of vegetation meant less habitat for many and varied water dependent animals, fish and birds.

The North Marsh reed bed (the largest reed bed in the Murray Darling Basin) caught a lightning strike in October 2019 and about 5,000 ha was burnt.

fire North Marsh reed bed, October 2019

It was a tough time for the Traditional Owners and Elders, the landholders, recreational fishers, the whole community. It was a tough time to be an environmentalist.

We knew the reed beds need flood water ASAP. While they shot up after some rain fall that summer, we understood that they were using what little precious reserves their rhizomes held, making floodwater even more critical to their recovery.

Then the floods came in February 2020, entering the Macquarie in several events through the Bell, Little and Talbragar Rivers – all of which are downstream of Burrendong Dam.

Supplementary access to several of the flows was allowed, removing about 35 Gigalitres before the Marshes. From the 130 GL that was metered upstream of the Marshes, an unknown, unmetered volume of water was floodplain harvested.

These extraction activities were allowed from the critical first flush after the most severe drought we have known. From the information I have been able to find through the WaterNSW and DPIE water websites, I do not think the critical environmental needs of the Ramsar listed internationally significant Macquarie Marshes, or the water-starved river and creeks downstream of Warren, were given enough consideration when the decision to allow take was made.

The go ahead to pump and divert was given before critical human need, and stock and domestic requirements downstream had been actually met (only forecast to be met).

It was not until late April 2020, after the on-farm storages near the river were reportedly almost full, that flood water finally made it to the northern most part of the charred reed bed. Because the flows were delayed, the reeds in the northern most area missed the opportunity to get as much growth in as possible while the days were still warm, so they could store as much energy as possible before winter. We will see the impact of the delayed inundation on the recovery of the northern most section of the reed bed in spring.

Because of the delay in flows reaching all of the fire damaged reed bed, the requirement for environmental water in the Macquarie Marshes is still classified as HIGH as of autumn 2020. Connecting the Macquarie to the Barwon-Darling Rivers is a critical requirement for native fish and seasonal water replenishment in the Barwon. With flows reduced by unknown volumes, it will be more difficult to achieve the connection.

It is difficult to overstate to the reader how frustrating it is that the volumes of floodplain harvested water taken this year in the Macquarie Valley are not public.

When asked in a drought update public forum on Thursday 28th May 2020 what the volumes of floodplain harvesting take have been in the Macquarie Valley so far in 2020, WaterNSW stated they were under no obligation to tell the public. In the media, on twitter and facebook, when discussing floodplain harvesting take, representatives of the local irrigation industry play down the volume involved: “we only have a small number of floodplain harvesters in the Macquarie” Says Tony Quigley, Chair Macquarie River Food and Fibre on  ABC radio, NSW Country Hour 27/5/2020 

As this map shows, there are 99 properties and 180 storages being assessed for floodplain harvesting in the Macquarie.

nth basin mapSource: NSW Govt, Floodplain Harvesting Measurement Policy March 2020.

The Policy

The protection of first flush flows as droughts are breaking is a critically urgent matter that needs to be addressed ASAP. Floodplain harvesting should be completely restricted before the issuing of new property rights in the form of floodplain harvesting licences.

The cumulative impact of floodplain harvesting on the environment, culture, communities and economies of the Basin must be assessed before the issue of brand new property rights.

The climate is drying and water is becoming scarcer. In the spirit of the Commonwealth Water Act 2007 and the Murray Darling Basin Plan, the needs of the environment must be prioritised. Following the development of the floodplain harvesting it seems to me that the current NSW Government prioritises maximising irrigation extraction, framing that priority as ‘supporting communities’.

The issuing of floodplain harvesting licences will be the biggest issue of brand new property rights since the 1990’s. It will signify a massive wealth shift from the public purse to private and corporate hands.

Floodplain harvesting licences should not be tradable. As physical structures are involved it would be difficult and expensive to monitor compliance. Opportunistic access to flows should not be a tradable right.

Floodplain harvesting licences were made compensable in a 2014 amendment to the NSW Water Management Act 2000 (WMA), even though they still don’t exist. Section 87AA of the WMA must be overturned. Until it is, there is a risk that any adjustment to volumes after licences are issued will mean compensation is payable.

There must be no carryover allowance in the policy. Take must be limited to 100% of share allocation a year. Carry over allowances (up to 500% in the 2010 draft policy) will mean in dry times accounts can accumulate up to 5 times the total licence volume. When a drought breaks, the need for water in the environment is extreme. This will coincide with empty farm dams and access accounts several times larger than the licence allowance. To assist the protection of first flush flows, there must be no carryover allowance.

There should be no exemption for rainfall run off capture in a developed area. Rainfall captured on irrigation fields should either be the 10% harvestable right that all landholders have access to, or be included in a water access licence.

The Long Term Annual Average Extraction Limit must not be increased to accommodate new floodplain harvesting access licence shares. The new volumes must be included in the current volume of shares in each water source.

The irrigation industry has expanded to the large scale it is by benefiting from free access to vast volumes of floodwater, sometimes using unapproved illegal structures. To rectify this enormous imbalance, the volumes of take need to be rationalised under current limits. Bringing floodplain harvesting volumes under the current levels of take will have a big impact on the scale of the irrigation industry in the Northern Basin. The main crop that would be impacted happens to be cotton. Employment in cotton has decreased significantly in recent years due to advances in labour saving technology and genetic modification, despite crop sizes and water extraction increasing. Investment in regional communities is required to build resilience in our rural economies facing a future with less water. Reports show investing in human services in Basin communities is the most efficient and secure way to encourage economies to diversify.[1]

In January 2020 with flooding rain forecast to fall in just weeks, one department director at a meeting of senior NSW water officials is quoted in the media as saying “If you don’t have basic rights or an exemption, there is no ability to legally take water,” The Guardian Friday 29 May 2020, Kerry Brewster. NSW Officials knew decades of unmeasured floodplain harvesting by irrigators was illegal..

On the 7th February 2020 the Water Management (General) Amendment (Exemptions for Floodplain Harvesting) Regulation 2020 (“the Regulation”) came in, with no notice or explanation. The effect of the regulation was to give retrospective approval to works that had not been approved.

The Government explained that the regulation mentioned above was required so that an embargo could be placed to limit take by floodplain harvesting, but that is not the case. Take could have been restricted without it. The regulation must be repealed.

 Conclusion

Floods bring life. That is not merely a cheap platitude. Floods have, and continue to, form and feed our landscapes, rivers, wetlands, billabongs, aquifers, rich fertile floodplains, estuaries and oceans.

Since the 1990’s, the floods in the Basin have been taken. Massive volumes, entire flood events have been withheld and kept for free, to be used to create personal and corporate profit. The irrigation industry has had free access to unmeasured water from the floodplains for the past 30 years, at astounding cost to the environment, communities and economies downstream.

The injustice of this is situation is intolerable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] Modelling variants of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan in the context of adverse conditions in the Basin, Glyn Wittwer March 2020.

 

Drought of Record & the Macquarie Valley

Drought of Record defines the period when inflows into each catchment were at their historic lowest. The NSW Government uses the Drought of Record inflows to work out how much water can be extracted from the rivers in the year ahead, by coming up with an Available Water Determination.

In the case of several NSW rivers, including the Macquarie River, the Drought of Record is only based on the years before July 2004. That means that in future years, the current shocking drought will not be considered when the Government comes up with the Available Water Determination. Water managers will continue to assume Burrendong dam will fill every two years.

Truth Pie

Until the rains came in early 2020, the Macquarie River was on track to stop flowing at Burrendong dam by October 2020, in what would have been an environmental, economic and social catastrophe.

Capping the Drought of Record to pre-2004 volumes was the doing of then NSW Water Minister Kevin Humphries in 2014. Listen as Mr Humphries explains that saving water ‘just in case’ there is another big drought would reduce general security license allocations by between 8 and 20%.

Kevin Humpries explains capping the Drought of Record

Current NSW Water Minister Pavey reinforced the Government’s priorities in Parliament in November 2019 where she said:

To include a rule that automatically requires the water supply system to adjust to new record drought would potentially result in significant quantities of water being locked away from productive use.”

The NSW upper house passed a motion last week (SMH H.Alexander&P.Hannam 19/5/20) calling on Water Minister Melinda Pavey to use up to date drought figures before submitting the water resource plans to the Murray-Darling Basin Authority for accreditation.

[Quoting from the article] Independent MP Justin Field, who moved the motion, said the National Party had explicitly removed the 2001-2009 Millenium Drought from consideration in the 2014 water-sharing plans .. “That left regional towns facing running out of water, rivers starved and massive additional stresses in agricultural and river communities,” Mr Field said.”Now is the opportunity to fix these plans before this failed model is locked in for another decade risking future water shortages.”

Mr Field’s motion was supported by Labor, Greens, One Nation and Shooters, Fishers and Farmers MPs.

Dubbo mayor Ben Shields said the irrigation lobby had unduly influenced water policy and town supply was becoming a concern for the first time. Burrendong Dam dropped to 2 per cent capacity before recent rains pushed the level to 21 per cent.

“These sort of droughts are only going to get worse and the lack of water is only going to get worse,” Mr Shields said.

 

image: Macquarie River 22km downstream of Warren November 2019

Parched marshlands in danger due to water shortages

Daily Liberal Daniel Sharkie 15/5/20

Mel Gray, a representative of the Healthy Rivers Dubbo group has called on the state government to make changes to their current involvement in the Murray-Darling basin plan in order to avoid passing beyond a ‘tipping point’ with regards to the river system.

“We’re going to need tighter rules in our water sharing plan that protect those vital first flows,” Ms Gray said.

“We’re facing a future where water is going to be more scarce than ever before in the Macquarie valley, there was a report by the state government in 2013 that told us we would have 30 percent less potable water by 2030, and unfortunately, those predictions seem to be an underestimation.”

While the group have criticised the recent proposal to create a re-regulating weir between Narromine and Warren in recent weeks, they also remain opposed to what they consider high rates of water extraction from the system.

“This is how we got into the situation that we’re in now in the first place,” Ms Gray said.

Ms Gray says that maintaining the current rate of extraction, and committing to the weir, will exacerbate the current situation and cause possibly fatal damage to the Macquarie marsh lands ecosystem.

“It’s not a good idea to extract further water from an already stressed system,” Ms Gray said.

Member for Dubbo, Dugald Saunders said that ensuring the environmental health of the Murray-Darling basin remained the goal of the government’s participation in the Murray-Darling plan.

“For my part I will continue to work with all water users and interests, including recreational users, in the Dubbo electorate to find the best balance in ensuring the river habitat is sustained while commercial agricultural producers are given the opportunity to generate income and jobs for this region,” Mr Saunders said.

He welcomed the recent wet weather as a possible salve.

“The extreme drought of the past three years has impacted on the availability of water for all users including the environment generally, and the marshes specifically,” Mr Saunders said.

“Like all residents of this region I hope the recent return to wetter weather continues to put water into the dam and brings widespread benefit to the environment, farming families and our local communities.”